Close
this window to return to the unit.
Sample Rubrics:
Rubric for Evaluating
Analysis
CATEGORY
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Satisfactory
|
Needs
Improvement |
Description |
Makes a complete and detailed description of the subject matter and/or
elements seen in a work. |
Makes a detailed description of most of the subject matter and/or
elements seen in a work. |
Makes a detailed description of some of the subject matter and/or
elements seen in a work. |
Descriptions are not detailed or complete. |
Analysis |
Accurately describes several dominant elements or principles used
by the artist and accurately relates how they are used by the artist
to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the artwork.
|
Accurately describes a couple of dominant elements and principles
used by the artist and accurately relates how these are used by the
artist to reinforce the theme, meaning, mood, or feeling of the artwork.
|
Describes some dominant elements and principles used by the artist,
but has difficulty describing how these relate to the meaning or feeling
of the artwork. |
Has trouble picking out the dominant elements. |
Interpretation |
Forms a somewhat reasonable hypothesis about the symbolic or metaphorical
meaning and is able to support this with evidence from the work.
|
Student identifies the literal meaning of the work. |
Student can relate how the work makes him/her feel personally.
|
Student finds it difficult to interpret the meaning of the work.
|
Evaluation |
Uses multiple criteria to judge the artwork, such as composition,
expression, creativity, design, communication of ideas. |
Uses 1-2 criteria to judge the artwork. |
Tries to use aesthetic criteria to judge artwork, but does not apply
the criteria accurately. |
Evaluates work as good or bad based on personal taste. |
Rubric for Evaluating
Student Work
CATEGORY
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Satisfactory
|
Needs
Improvement |
Content |
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge
is excellent. |
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears
to be good. |
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual
errors. |
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. |
Originality |
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative
and inventive. |
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.
|
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little
evidence of original thinking. |
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.
|
Requirements |
All requirements are met and exceeded. |
All requirements are met. |
One requirement was not completely met. |
More than one requirement was not completely met. |
Presentation |
Presentation holds audience attention. |
Presentation holds audience attention most of the time. |
Presentation is able to maintain interest of the audience most of
the time. |
Presentation often loses audience attention. |
Attractiveness |
Makes excellent use of color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to
presentation. |
Makes good use of color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.
|
Makes use of color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these
detract from the presentation content. |
Use of color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from
the presentation content. |
|